MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971017512 · doi:10.1021/ma001544o

An Exactly Solvable Ogston Model of Gel Electrophoresis. 7. Diffusion and Mobility of Hard Spherical Particles in Three-Dimensional Gels

2001· article· en· W1971017512 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean‐François Mercier, Gary W. Slater

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsExtrapolationLattice (music)Limit (mathematics)DiffusionPhysicsElectrophoresisStatistical physicsChemistryMathematical analysisThermodynamicsMathematicsChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We extend our lattice model of gel electrophoresis (and diffusion) to the study of the continuum limit (no lattice effect) for hard spherical particles migrating in periodic and random three-dimensional gels. To reach the continuum limit, the mesh size of the system is progressively decreased until a clear extrapolation to the continuum limit (where the size of the lattice parameter is infinitely small in comparison to the size of the gel fibers) can be done. Various types of gel are studied, starting from simple periodic parallel and straight fibers to a representation of a more realistic gel formed of irregular, cross-linked fibers placed along random directions. Our mobility data for pseudospherical particles in the continuum limit are interpreted in terms of the obstruction model of diffusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207