NMR Metabolomics Analysis of the Effects of 5-Lipoxygenase Inhibitors on Metabolism in Glioblastomas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Changes across metabolic networks are emerging as an integral part of cancer development and progression. Increasing comprehension of the importance of metabolic processes as well as metabolites in cancer is stimulating exploration of novel, targeted treatment options. Arachidonic acid (AA) is a major component of phospholipids. Through the cascade catalyzed by cyclooxygenases and lipoxygenases, AA is also a precursor to cellular signaling molecules as well as molecules associated with a variety of diseases including cancer. 5-Lipoxygenase catalyzes the transformation of AA into leukotrienes (LT), important mediators of inflammation. High-throughput analysis of metabolic profiles was used to investigate the response of glioblastoma cell lines to treatment with 5-lipoxygenase inhibitors. Metabolic profiling of cells following drug treatment provides valuable information about the response and metabolic alterations induced by the drug action and give an indication of both on-target and off-target effects of drugs. Four different 5-lipoxygenase inhibitors and antioxidants were tested including zileuton, caffeic acid, and its analogues caffeic acid phenethyl ester and caffeic acid cyclohexethyl ester. A NMR approach identified metabolic signatures resulting from application of these compounds to glioblastoma cell lines, and metabolic data were used to develop a better understanding of the mode of action of these inhibitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".