MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971127630 · doi:10.1021/jp0135860

Sampling Phase Space by a Combined QM/MM ab Initio Car−Parrinello Molecular Dynamics Method with Different (Multiple) Time Steps in the Quantum Mechanical (QM) and Molecular Mechanical (MM) Domains

2002· article· en· W1971127630 on OpenAlexafffund
Tom K. Woo, Peter Margl, Peter E. Blöchl, Tom Ziegler

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMolecular dynamicsQM/MMPhase spaceIntegratorStatistical physicsSampling (signal processing)Ab initioQuantumTrajectoryPhysicsClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study considers a scheme for sampling phase space in large molecules based on Car−Parrinello ab initio molecular dynamics. The scheme makes use of a combined quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics (QM/MM) method augmented with a multiple-time-step technique. This scheme makes it possible to oversample the computationally less expensive MM region relative to the QM domain. The goal here is to provide better ensemble averaging in the MM region that is usually larger in size and therefore typically has a higher degree of configurational variability. It is shown that the multiple-time-step integrator will generate the same trajectory as a standard molecular dynamics integrator. Moreover, with a gradual rescaling of masses, the energy conservation of a multiple-time-step simulation can be satisfied to the same extent as a standard simulation. Finally, it is demonstrated that the multiple-time-step QM/MM method can accelerate the equilibration and configurational sampling of a molecular dynamics simulation as it is used in thermodynamic integration. The scheme is not intended as a tool for generating trajectories in actual dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207