MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971143756 · doi:10.4141/cjps07020

Genetic diversity of the invasive plant <i>Coreopsis grandiflora</i> at different altitudes in Laoshan Mountain, China

2008· article· en· W1971143756 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yu Liang, Jian Liu, Shu Ping Zhang, Shujun Wang, Wei Guo, Ren Qing Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant and Fungal Species Descriptions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceShandong University
KeywordsGenetic diversityRAPDBiologyDiversity indexAltitude (triangle)Genetic distanceBotanyGenetic variationEcologyPopulationGeneticsSpecies richnessGeneDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to understand the relationship between genetic diversity and the invasiveness of exotic plants, genetic diversity was studied in the invasive plant Coreopsis grandiflora Hogg. at different altitudes in Laoshan Mountain, Northern China. Coreopsis grandiflora has produced a great deal of damage in Laoshan Mountain. Its genetic diversity was examined using 16 random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) primers, and 125 bands were collected from all individuals. The mean percentage of polymorphic loci (P%) was 39.54%, and the total percentage of polymorphic loci (P%) was 86.40%. The mean Shannon's Information index (H 0 ) was 0.2326 and the mean Nei's genetic diversity (H) was 0.1596. These results indicated a comparatively high genetic diversity in C. grandiflora in Laoshan Mountain. The genetic differentiation among populations (G ST ) was 0.3948, indicating that most genetic diversity occurs within populations. On the whole, the abundance and the genetic diversity of C. grandiflora decreased with increasing altitude. The high genetic diversity may be related to the invasion of C. grandiflora in Laoshan Mountain. Key words: Biological invasions, Coreopsis grandiflora Hogg., genetic distance, genetic diversity, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), sexual reproduction, Shannon’s information index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.834

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicPlant and Fungal Species DescriptionsFrench-language works237,207