MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Observation of a Double Maximum in the Dependence of Conductivity on Oxidation State in Potassium Fulleride Nanowires Supported by a Mesoporous Niobium Oxide Host Lattice

2001· article· en· W1971164334 on OpenAlex
B. Ye, Michel L. Trudeau, David M. Antonelli

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Materials · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFullerene Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceNiobiumNiobium oxideMesoporous materialOxideNanowireStoichiometryConductivityLattice (music)SuperconductivityPotassiumCondensed matter physicsOxidation stateChemical physicsNanotechnologyChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryPhysical chemistryMetalCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-stoichiometric potassium fulleride nanowires, KnC60, intercalated into the pores of mesoporous niobium oxide (see Figure), show conductivity maxima that are different from those of bulk fullerides. An interesting result that is attributed to an electronic transition in the material to a cooperative state, in which the structure is no longer acting as a one- dimensional system, is obtained at n = 4.1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it