MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971174562 · doi:10.4153/cjm-2006-039-5

Karamata Renewed and Local Limit Results

2006· article· en· W1971174562 on OpenAlexaff
David Handelman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical functions and polynomials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsRadius of convergenceLimit (mathematics)Interval (graph theory)Function (biology)Convergence (economics)RADIUSConstant (computer programming)Unit (ring theory)Series (stratigraphy)Mathematical analysisUnit intervalCombinatoricsUnit circleAnalytic functionPure mathematicsPower series

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Connections between behaviour of real analytic functions (with no negative Maclaurin series coefficients and radius of convergence one) on the open unit interval, and to a lesser extent on arcs of the unit circle, are explored, beginning with Karamata's approach. We develop conditions under which the asymptotics of the coefficients are related to the values of the function near 1; specifically, a ( n ) ∼ f (1 – 1/ n )/α n (for some positive constant α), where f ( t ) = Σ a ( n ) t n . In particular, if F = Σ c ( n ) t n where c ( n ) ≥ 0 and Σ c ( n ) = 1, then f defined as (1 – F ) –1 (the renewal or Green's function for F ) satisfies this condition if F ′ does (and a minor additional condition is satisfied). In come cases, we can show that the absolute sum of the differences of consecutiveMaclaurin coefficients converges. We also investigate situations in which less precise asymptotics are available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MathematicsSame topicMathematical functions and polynomialsFrench-language works237,207