MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971192369 · doi:10.1089/027245701753179811

Production, Characterization, and Epitope Mapping of Monoclonal Antibodies Against Human Polydeoxyribonucleotide Kinase

2001· article· en· W1971192369 on OpenAlexaff
Mesfin Fanta, Hong Zhang, Nina Bernstein, Mark Glover, Feridoun Karimi‐Busheri, Michael Weinfeld

Bibliographic record

VenueHybridoma · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonoclonal antibodyEpitopeWestern blotMolecular biologyRecombinant DNAAntibodyCyanogen bromideBiologyChinese hamster ovary cellImmunoassayEpitope mappingBiochemistryPeptide sequenceReceptorGeneImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polydeoxyribonucleotide kinase (PNK) is a mammalian DNA repair enzyme that has the capacity to phosphorylate 5' DNA termini and dephosphorylate 3' DNA termini. A series of murine monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) was raised against the full-length recombinant human PNK. Seven of these antibodies were selected and characterized by enzyme immunoassay, Western blot analysis, and their capacity to immunoprecipitate PNK. The epitope location was defined by cyanogen bromide digestion and by using a truncated PNK for Western blot analysis. All of the MAbs recognize a single 60-kDa protein in human cell extracts. PNKs from calf, monkey, and Chinese hamster cell and tissue extracts were also detected by some or all of the MAbs. These antibodies can be successfully used for the cellular, biochemical, and functional analysis of PNK in different mammalian cell lines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHybridomaSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207