Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nanostructured manganese oxide films for electrochemical supercapacitors were obtained by cathodic electrosynthesis from aqueous NaMnO 4 solutions. The proposed deposition mechanism is based on cathodic reduction of MnO 4 − species. The amount of the deposited material has been controlled by the variation of deposition time at a constant current density. Obtained films were studied by scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction analysis, thermogravimetric and differential thermal analysis. It was found that the composition and microstructure of the films depend on the concentration of NaMnO 4 in the solutions used for deposition. The films prepared from the 0˙02M NaMnO 4 solutions were crack free and porous with typical pore size of about 100–200 nm. Cyclic voltammetry and chronopotentiometry data for the films tested in the 0˙1M Na 2 SO 4 solutions showed capacitive behaviour in the voltage window of 0–1˙0 V versus standard calomel reference electrode. The highest specific capacitance of ∼220 F g −1 was obtained for 90 μg cm −2 films at a scan rate of 2 mV s −1 using Ni substrates. The capacitance decreased with increasing scan rate. The charge storage mechanism is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it