MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971298708 · doi:10.1094/cc-82-0246

Granule‐Bound Starch Synthase I (GBSSI) in Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i> Willd.) and Its Relationship to Amylose Content

2005· article· en· W1971298708 on OpenAlexaff
Nienke Lindeboom, Peter R. Chang, Robert T. Tyler, Ravindra N. Chibbar

Bibliographic record

VenueCereal Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood composition and properties
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmyloseStarch synthaseStarchChenopodium quinoaChemistryGranule (geology)BiochemistryFood scienceBotanyBiologyAmylopectin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The amylose concentration in starch from 16 quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes grown under identical conditions was 4–20%. Based on the amylose content, a selection of six genotypes was made. Starch granule‐bound proteins were extracted from six genotypes and analyzed using denaturing gel electrophoresis. Two major polypeptides with apparent molecular masses of 56 and 62 kDa were present in all genotypes. Both were identified as granule‐bound starch synthase I (GBSSI) using immunoblot analysis and internal peptide sequencing. The content of the two GBSSI isoforms in starch granules from the six genotypes, as determined by densiometry of the peptide bands, was positively correlated with the concentration of amylose in starch from mature seed. Starch synthase activity in developing seed was positively correlated to starch concentration in seed and amylose concentration in starch during seed development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.956

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCereal ChemistrySame topicFood composition and propertiesFrench-language works237,207