MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971302536 · doi:10.1117/1.1899312

Electro-thermally driven microgrippers for micro-electro-mechanical systems applications

2005· article· en· W1971302536 on OpenAlexafffund
Evgueni V. Bordatchev

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Micro/Nanolithography MEMS and MOEMS · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersGeneral Motors of Canada
KeywordsMicroactuatorFabricationMaterials scienceSurface micromachiningMechanical engineeringResistive touchscreenElectrical conductorActuatorNanotechnologyComputer scienceComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents design, fabrication, and performance testing of an innovative, laser machined structure to act as a microgripper. The proposed design constitutes of a pair of identical, cascaded actuation structures oriented in a face-to-face direction, to act as microtweezers. Each microactuator consists of five actuation units joined together horizontally in a consecutive order to build the cascaded structure. The actuation unit incorporates an internal constrainer and two semi-circular-shaped actuation beams. The actuation principle is based on the electro-thermal effect. On application of electrical potential at the backends, the conductive, geometrically complex structure of the microgripper produces non-uniform resistive heating and uneven thermal expansion generating tweezing displacements and force through a cumulative effect of all the individual actuation units within the cascaded microactuators. High-precision laser micromachining process was employed in the fabrication of the copper and nickel-based prototype microgrippers with overall dimension of 1.4 mm(L)×2.8 mm(W) and with relative accuracy within 1%. The geometrical parameters of the prototypes were evaluated in terms of accuracy and precision to demonstrate the fabrication capabilities. Challenges involved and the solutions to develop functional microparts with high aspect ratio (dimensional) with respect to the local elements and overall dimensions were described. The performance of the two microgripper prototypes was analyzed and compared. These microgrippers are useful in micromanipulating and microhandling operations for micro-electro-mechanical systems, biological, medical, chemical, and electro-opto-mechanical engineering applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Micro/Nanolithography MEMS and MOEMSSame topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207