CONDITION MONITORING IN A HYDRAULIC SYSTEM OF AN INDUSTRIAL MACHINE USING UNSCENTED KALMAN FILTER
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper develops a model-based technique based on the Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) for on-line condition monitoring, and applies it to the hydraulic system of an automated industrial fish processing machine. First an analytical model of the hydraulic system is developed and the system parameters are identified (determined). Then the developed UKF approach is implemented in the machine. The UKF employs an unscented transformation to select a minimal set of sample points around the mean, which are then propagated through nonlinear functions, from which the mean and covariance of the estimate are recovered. This approach is known to be more accurate for nonlinear systems. For experimental investigation of the performance of the approach, four common hydraulic faults are deliberately introduced into the machine. The four faults are external leakage in the two chambers of the hydraulic cylinder; internal leakage; and dry friction build-up at the moving support plate of the cutter carriage. Three levels of leakage are manually introduced to the system for each fault scenario using needle valves. The criteria that are considered in fault diagnosing are residual moving average of the errors, chamber pressures, and actuator characteristics. The experimental results show that the developed technique is able to accurately determine the fault conditions of the machine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".