MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971308765 · doi:10.1172/jci57158

Therapeutic strategies for the clinical blockade of IL-6/gp130 signaling

2011· review· en· W1971308765 on OpenAlexaff
Simon A. Jones, Jürgen Scheller, Stefan Rose‐John

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Investigation · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersVersus ArthritisExzellenzclusters EntzündungsforschungDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftWellcome Trust
KeywordsGlycoprotein 130BlockadeTocilizumabAutoimmunityImmunologyMedicineRegulatorInflammationReceptorDiseaseCytokineInterleukin-6 receptorAntibodyInterleukin 6BiologyInternal medicineRheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The successful treatment of certain autoimmune conditions with the humanized anti-IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) antibody tocilizumab has emphasized the clinical importance of cytokines that signal through the β-receptor subunit glycoprotein 130 (gp130).In this Review, we explore how gp130 signaling controls disease progression and examine why IL-6 has a special role among these cytokines as an inflammatory regulator.Attention will be given to the role of the soluble IL-6R, and we will provide a perspective into the clinical blockade of IL-6 activity in autoimmunity, inflammation, and cancer.Conflict of interest: Stefan Rose-John is an inventor on the patent describing the function of sgp130Fc.He is also a shareholder of the CONARIS Research Institute (Kiel, Germany), which is commercially developing sgp130Fc as a therapy for inflammatory diseases.Simon A. Jones has a consultancy agreement with Roche Pharmaceuticals and advises research relating to the clinical introduction of Actemra/RoActemra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.499
GPT teacher head0.522
Teacher spread0.023 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations680
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical InvestigationSame topicCytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207