MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971317665 · doi:10.1364/josaa.26.002023

Compound ring resonator circuit for integrated optics applications

2009· article· en· W1971317665 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Gad, David Yevick, P. E. Jessop

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Optical Society of America A · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResonatorOpticsRing (chemistry)Integrated opticsMaterials scienceSplit-ring resonatorOptoelectronicsPhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A signal interleaver/ deinterleaver based on ring resonators is proposed and analyzed with the transfer matrix and the Z-transform techniques. The proposed structure is composed of rings connected in a closed loop and is termed a "compound ring resonator circuit." The interleaver/deinterleaver circuit is designed to meet wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) specifications for two channels of spacing of 50 GHz, a channel free spectral range of 100 GHz, a crosstalk of -24 dB, and a maximum dispersion of +/-22 ps/nm over a +/-10 GHz bandwidth at a wavelength of 1.55 microm. Compared with previous circuits of this nature, this circuit possesses a smaller number of rings, a simpler design, does not require apodization, exhibits less dispersion, and offers a higher fabrication tolerance and density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Optical Society of America ASame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207