MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971329599 · doi:10.1042/bst0320362

Functional analysis of the tumour suppressor gene PTEN in murine B cells and keratinocytes

2004· review· en· W1971329599 on OpenAlexaff
Akira Suzuki, Takehiko Sasaki, TW Mak, Toru Nakano

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemical Society Transactions · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPTENTensinBiologyKeratinocyteCancer researchMolecular biologyPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwaySignal transductionCell biologyCell cultureGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To investigate the roles of the PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted from chromosome 10)/PI3K (phosphoinositide 3-kinase) signalling pathway in vivo, we have generated a series of mutant mice with null or tissue-specific gene-targeted deletions of Pten. Here we present our investigations of Pten function in B cells and keratinocytes in mice. Mice with a B cell-specific mutation of Pten showed increased serum autoantibodies and elevated numbers of B1a cells. Among conventional B (B2) cells in mutant spleens, numbers of marginal zone B cells were significantly increased, while those of follicular B cells were reciprocally decreased. Immunoglobulin class switch recombination was defective and associated with impaired induction of activation-induced cytidine deaminase. Mice with a keratinocyte-specific mutation of Pten exhibited epidermal hyperplasia, hyperkeratosis and accelerated skin morphogenesis. Within 3 weeks of birth, 90% of these animals died of malnutrition, possibly caused by hyperkeratosis of the oesophageal epithelia. Surviving mutant mice developed spontaneous skin tumours within 8.5 months of birth, and chemical treatment accelerated the onset of tumours. Our data show that PTEN is an important regulator in B cells and keratinocytes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemical Society TransactionsSame topicPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerFrench-language works237,207