Spanning or Looping? The Order and Conformation of Bipolar Phospholipids in Lipid Membranes Using 2H NMR Spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Solid-state 2H NMR spectroscopy was used to study and characterize the conformation and order of bolaform lipid membranes. A series of 2H-labeled bolaform phosphatidylcholines has been synthesized and their properties compared to a [D4]dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) and a [D8]-32 macrocyclic phosphatidylcholine. 31P NMR measurements establish that the aqueous dispersions of these lipids adopt lamellar phases. Computational dePakeing was used to extract the spectrum of the oriented system from spectra consisting of a superposition of randomly oriented domains in an unoriented sample. A large (> 90 %) and constant value for the normalized segmental order parameter (Smol) was observed for all positions along the diacyl chain of the bolaform lipids and only a small population (< 10%) of a less ordered conformer was observed. The less ordered conformer is assigned to the looping conformation on the basis of comparison with the deuterated macrocyclic phospholipid which has an enforced loop in its diacyl chain. The predominant population(> 90%) of the bolaform lipids is assigned to a highly ordered, spanning conformer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".