MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971356129 · doi:10.1134/s1063783406030036

The origin of an elastic line in the L3 x-ray emission spectrum of metallic manganese

2006· article· en· W1971356129 on OpenAlexaff
L. D. Finkel’shteĭn, I. A. Nekrasov, A. V. Lukoyanov, E.Z. Kurmaev, В. И. Анисимов, S. Kučas, Aušra Kynienė, A. Moewes, J. L. Wang, Zhi Zeng

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of the Solid State · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcited stateMultipletMaterials scienceGround stateManganeseAbsorption spectroscopyEmission spectrumSpectral lineAtomic physicsElectronic structureAbsorption (acoustics)Line (geometry)MetalXANESTransition metalCondensed matter physicsPhysicsChemistryOpticsMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A strong elastic line has been found in the L 3 x-ray emission spectrum of metallic Mn. To unravel its physical nature, the ground-state properties of α-Mn were studied in comparison with those of 3 d metals (Cr and Fe in bcc structure), as well as the properties of the L 3 absorption final states of these three transition metals. To model the electronic structure, LSDA band-structure calculations of Cr, Mn, and Fe were carried out, and L 3 absorption spectra of these metals were computed in the atomic approximation. A joint analysis of the properties of the ground state and of the final absorption state excited by an x-ray-produced core hole suggests that the elastic line in the α-Mn spectra should be assigned to the specific character of the absorption final-state multiplet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of the Solid StateSame topicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence AnalysisFrench-language works237,207