Paleoproterozoic subduction in northwestern Canada from near-vertical and wide-angle seismic reflection data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Near-vertical incidence and refraction – wide-angle reflection seismic data, recorded as part of Lithoprobe studies in the Paleoproterozoic–Archean domains of Canada’s Northwest Territories, show remarkable reflections from within the upper mantle. A parallel pair of reflectors imaged by the near-vertical data can be traced from Moho levels (∼33 km) down to ∼70 km depth. In a previous study, the reflectors were interpreted as the top and bottom of an ∼1.8 Ga subducted oceanic crust beneath the Hottah terrane. Further inboard, where the seismic line changes its direction from east–west to nearly north–south, another pair of reflectors extends subhorizontally for about 100 km at ∼70 km depth before dipping downward. The subhorizontal reflectors were not correlated with the dipping slab; instead they were interpreted as a separate feature. However, they roughly coincide with a horizontal interface modeled from wide-angle data by an earlier study. Considering the crooked line acquisition geometry, we re-examined both near-vertical incidence and wide-angle reflection data using 2-dimensional (2-D) and 3-D forward and inverse modeling algorithms. Our results demonstrate that the subhorizontal reflectors are the continuation of the relict subducted slab, which now extends laterally for 300 km. Its base is the source of the wide-angle data. The apparent flattening for the near-vertical data is most likely an artifact of projecting a 3-D geometry onto a 2-D cross section. The shallowly subducted slab probably contributed to the thickening and stabilization of the subcrustal lithosphere below the Wopmay orogen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".