Beyond the "Two Psychiatries": Jack Pressman's Last Resort and the History of Twentieth-Century American Psychiatry: Introduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After Jack Pressman's death in June 1997, friends and colleagues sought various ways to honor his memory. With the help of Guenter Risse, Jack's colleague at the University of California at San Francisco, I organized one such event for the 1998 annual meeting of the American Association for the History of Medicine in Toronto, Canada: a lunchtime symposium titled "Beyond the 'Two Psychiatries': A Roundtable Discussion of the History of Twentieth-Century American Psychiatry." Guenter Risse chaired the session, and shared his own personal reflections on Jack's career at the University of California at San Francisco. In preparing their presentations, the other participants--John Burnham, Ellen Dwyer, and Joel Braslow--were asked to comment on two related questions: first, what problems does writing the history of twentieth-century psychiatry pose for scholars; and second, how does Jack's work point to directions that future work should take? The papers in this Bulletin collection are revised versions of the talks that they gave at the Toronto meeting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".