La sédation palliative pour soulager la souffrance existentielle en fin de vie : regard sur une pratique controversée
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Des soins palliatifs accordant autant d’importance à toutes les facettes de la souffrance devraient être accessibles à tous ceux qui sont en phase terminale. Malheureusement, malgré les efforts déployés, certains resteront avec des souffrances qualifiées de réfractaires. Il semble que la sédation palliative devienne alors une option. Il existe beaucoup de controverses autour de cette pratique, tout particulièrement lorsqu’employée afin de soulager une souffrance de nature plus existentielle. Les objectifs de cet article sont d’abord de définir la pratique de la sédation palliative, ensuite d’examiner le concept de souffrance existentielle en soins palliatifs et enfin, d’aborder les implications pour la pratique infirmière.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".