MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971396646 · doi:10.1021/ef0501400

On the Stabilization Mechanism of Water-in-Oil Emulsions in Petroleum Systems

2005· article· en· W1971396646 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsSyncrude (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmulsionAsphalteneAdsorptionPulmonary surfactantPetroleumStabilizer (aeronautics)Chemical engineeringChemistryKineticsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a model explaining the mechanism of water-in-oil (W/O) emulsion stabilization in petroleum systems. According to the model, W/O petroleum emulsions are stabilized by at least two types of chemicals: one is a small subfraction of asphaltenes, and the other is a low-molecular-weight, surfactant-like material. Their competition for the oil/water interface is based on adsorption kinetics, rather than on differences in adsorption energies. The asphaltenic material adsorbs slowly and irreversibly and forms rigid skins. Surfactant-like species adsorb fast, reaching equilibrium. Both are effective emulsifiers; however, emulsion breaking requires different strategies, depending on the stabilizer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it