Frobenius fields for Drinfeld modules of rank 2
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Let ϕ be a Drinfeld module of rank 2 over the field of rational functions $F=\mathbb {F}_q(T)$ , with $\mathrm {End}_{\bar {F}}(\phi ) = \mathbb {F}_q[T]$ . Let K be a fixed imaginary quadratic field over F and d a positive integer. For each prime $\mathfrak {p}$ of good reduction for ϕ, let $\pi _{\mathfrak {p}}(\phi )$ be a root of the characteristic polynomial of the Frobenius endomorphism of ϕ over the finite field $\mathbb {F}_q[T] / \mathfrak {p}$ . Let Π ϕ ( K ; d ) be the number of primes $\mathfrak {p}$ of degree d such that the field extension $F(\pi _{\mathfrak {p}}(\phi ))$ is the fixed imaginary quadratic field K . We present upper bounds for Π ϕ ( K ; d ) obtained by two different approaches, inspired by similar ones for elliptic curves. The first approach, inspired by the work of Serre, is to consider the image of Frobenius in a mixed Galois representation associated to K and to the Drinfeld module ϕ. The second approach, inspired by the work of Cojocaru, Fouvry and Murty, is based on an application of the square sieve. The bounds obtained with the first method are better, but depend on the fixed quadratic imaginary field K . In our application of the second approach, we improve the results of Cojocaru, Murty and Fouvry by considering projective Galois representations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it