Development of a folded thrust stack: Humber Arm Allochthon, Bay of Islands, Newfoundland Appalachians
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the Humber Arm area of the western Newfoundland Appalachians, four distinct stratigraphic successions derived from the Laurentian continental margin are exposed. Each succession is believed to be characteristic of a separate thrust sheet. The platform sheet represents the ancient Laurentian shelf and its foreland basin cover; the Watsons Brook sheet is characterized by a succession including shelf-margin carbonates overlying foreland basin clastics; the Corner Brook sheet comprises continental slope and rise clastic and carbonate sedimentary rocks of the Humber Arm Supergroup; and the Woods Island sheet includes clastics of the Blow Me Down Brook formation that overlie mafic volcanics. Sheets are subdivided by thrusts into tectonic slices. Disrupted units and mélange, with scaly S1 foliation, are found along the boundaries of some slices. Thrust sheets and related structures have been deformed by F2 folds with axial planar S2 cleavage. S1 scaly foliations are transposed into parallelism with S2. There is a transition in the style of F2 folds across the area, from upright and subhorizontal in the west to overturned folds with west-dipping axial planes and steeply raking or reclined fold hinges in the east. Strongly curved fold hinges may reflect later shearing along the S2 surfaces, producing sheath-like fold geometries. Shear zones close to the east edge of the outcrop of the Watsons Brook sheet display kinematic indicators indicating both D2 reverse-sense and D3 normal-sense dip-slip shears. Subsequent events produced L4 and L5 crenulation lineations on the S2 surfaces. At minimum, several tens of kilometres of shortening affected the part of the margin preserved in the Humber Arm area; true shortening and transport amounts may have been much larger.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".