MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971437489 · doi:10.3109/09273948.2013.815785

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Uveitis: Clinical Features and Complications, Risk Factors for Severe Course, and Visual Outcome

2013· review· en· W1971437489 on OpenAlexaff
Albert T. Vitale, E M Graham, Joke H. de Boer

Bibliographic record

VenueOcular Immunology and Inflammation · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUveitisArthritisGlaucomaOphthalmologyDermatologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common childhood rheumatic disease and the most prevalent systemic disorder in children with uveitis. The risk of developing uveitis is the greatest among patients with oligoarticular onset of disease. Clinical features of JIA-associated uveitis (JIAU) are nongranulomatous inflammation, anterior in location, insidious at onset, chronic course, and frequently asymptomatic in the absence of ocular structural complications. Uveitis in JIA can worsen over time with many sight-threatening complications, such as band keratopathy in the visual axis, posterior synechiae, cataract, secondary glaucoma, macular edema, hypotony, epiretinal membrane, and optic nerve edema. Different studies have pointed out that several factors are associated with poor prognosis, including young age at onset, male gender, short interval between diagnosis of arthritis and uveitis, severity of uveitis at onset, and antinuclear antibody (ANA) positivity. Although JIA associated-uveitis is still a serious blinding disease, we are at least able to identify the high-risk group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations76
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOcular Immunology and InflammationSame topicOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeFrench-language works237,207