MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971439643 · doi:10.1103/physreve.72.061701

<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>NMR study of orientational ordering in the chiral-<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math>phase of partially deuterated smectic liquid crystals

2005· article· lv· W1971439643 on OpenAlexaff
Ronald Y. Dong, Jiadi Xu, J. Zhang, C. A. Veracini

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2005
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsBrandon UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon-13 NMR spectroscopy is used to probe the orientational ordering in the tilted chiral smectic phase of two partially deuterated liquid crystals. Quantitative analyses of the chemical shifts of the aromatic carbons in the smectic- and - phases enable us to obtain the location of the long molecular axis of the core and the off-diagonal order parameter of the molecular core in the smectic- phase. The advantage of knowing the ordering information of these molecules in their mesophases from deuteron studies is demonstrated in this work, as they can be used to guide the assignments. The temperature behaviors of the chemical shifts from the aromatic sites in the helical structure of the smectic- phase is caused by both an increase of the tilt angle and a change in the orientation of the principal frame that describes the molecular ordering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207