MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971442415 · doi:10.1063/1.3272711

Clustering criterion for inertial particles in two-dimensional time-periodic and three-dimensional steady flows

2010· article· en· W1971442415 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInertial frame of referenceCluster analysisPhysicsClassical mechanicsVortexFlow (mathematics)TorusMechanicsStatistical physicsCluster (spacecraft)Mathematical analysisMathematicsGeometryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We derive an analytic condition that predicts the exact location of inertial particle clustering in three-dimensional steady or two-dimensional time-periodic flows. The particles turn out to cluster on attracting inertial Lagrangian coherent structures that are smooth deformations of invariant tori. We illustrate our results on three-dimensional steady flows, including the Hill's spherical vortex and the Arnold-Beltrami-Childress flow, as well as on a two-dimensional time and space periodic flow that models a meandering jet in a channel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.733

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it