Les Inuit face aux changements climatiques et environnementaux
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’auteur propose une lecture anthropologique et critique de quelques débats actuels sur l’écologie et les enjeux environnementaux dans l’Arctique canadien. Il montre qu’à partir du moment où la société moderne ne reconnaît plus que sa légitimité découle de sources transcendantes, elle tend à y substituer ses propres valeurs, ce qu’elle effectue par l’intermédiaire de dispositifs éthique et juridique qu’elle souhaite aujourd’hui imposer aux populations locales. Dans le contexte des débats sur le réchauffement climatique, la transcendance de la science écologique et du droit paraît de plus en plus évidente, mais les politiques qui en résultent suscitent des résistances locales, donnant lieu à des chocs cosmopolitiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it