Range‐based localisation and tracking in non‐line‐of‐sight wireless channels with Gaussian scatterer distribution model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Range‐based localisation and tracking methods use the time‐of‐arrival (TOA) between the mobile station and several base stations, but the multipath propagation of non‐line‐of‐sight channels complicates the estimation and processing. For channel modelling, the Gaussian scatterer distribution model has been reported to have a reasonable match between its TOA probability density distribution (PDF) and measured TOA data. In this study, this TOA PDF is adapted, along with selection from multiple motion models of the mobile station, for a new location and tracking algorithm. Since the TOA PDF is non‐Gaussian and is a non‐linear function of the position of the mobile, particle filtering is used which increases the complexity of the algorithm. The focus is on the tracking performance, and this is evaluated by simulation using idealised statistical channels, allowing direct comparison between different location algorithms. In this context, the presented algorithm is more accurate than the benchmarks of extended Kalman filter tracking, and positioning using least squares.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it