MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971460530 · doi:10.1002/pc.20069

Numerical simulation of resin infusion and reinforcement consolidation under flexible cover

2005· article· en· W1971460530 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer Composites · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEpoxy Resin Curing Processes
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceMoldConsolidation (business)ReinforcementComposite materialCover (algebra)Concrete coverComposite numberBoundary value problemPorosityMechanical engineeringMathematicsEngineeringMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents the physical phenomena and equations governing resin infusion under a flexible cover. This composite manufacturing process known as vacuum assisted resin infusion (VARI) is analyzed here when the reinforcement is covered by a thin plastic film and resin is injected by gravity after a partial level of vacuum has been achieved in the cavity. In this process, the plastic cover is deformed as the resin fills up the mold cavity. Coupling between the mechanical deformation of the flexible cover and the resin flow inside the mold cavity is described by a set of mathematical equations with boundary conditions. Based on this model, a general methodology is developed to simulate numerically the resin flow during the infusion process. Validation of the numerical results is performed by comparison with a series of experiments. POLYM. COMPOS. 26:417–427, 2005. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it