MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971490931 · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004255

Hell's BELs: Bacterial E3 Ligases That Exploit the Eukaryotic Ubiquitin Machinery

2014· review· en· W1971490931 on OpenAlexafffund
Jon M. Huibregtse, John R. Rohde

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS Pathogens · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsUbiquitinDeubiquitinating enzymeUbiquitin ligaseBiochemistryUbiquitin-conjugating enzymeUbiquitin-Protein LigasesProteasomeUbiquitinsEnzymeSerineCell biologyLysineBiologyCysteineAmino acidChemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

How Do E3s Work in Eukaryotic Cells?A common post-translational modification in eukaryotes is the covalent attachment of ubiquitin, a 76 amino acid protein, to specific proteins.Most commonly, ubiquitin is conjugated to eamino groups of lysine residues, and in unusual cases it can be conjugated to serine and cysteine residues or the terminal amino group of a protein.This process, referred to as ubiquitination (or ubiquitylation), can result in a variety of outcomes for a protein, depending upon how many Ub molecules are attached, whether a polyubiquitin chain is formed, and the nature of the chain.Monoubiquitination can result in relocalization of proteins, while most polyubiquitin chains (e.g., K48 and K11-linked chains) direct proteins for proteasomal degradation.Linkages of Ub formed using Lys 63 or by end-to-end linkages (also known as Met Ub) [1] are not directed to the proteasome and can mediate protein trafficking, scaffolding of protein complexes, or enzyme activation.Ub chains are also used for targeting invading microbes for clearance via xenophagy [2].Ubiquitination is carried out by a series of enzymes.First, a ubiquitin activating enzyme (E1) forms a thioester with the Cterminus of Ub.The activated Ub is then transferred to one of many (,40 human) ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (E2s).Finally, the E3 enzymes (perhaps over 500 human E3s) direct the transfer of Ub to specific substrates.In eukaryotic cells there are two general classes of E3 ubiquitin ligases.The HECT (Homologous to E6-AP Carboxyl Terminus) and Ring Between Ring (RBR) domain E3s possess an invariant catalytic Cys residue that accepts Ub from a charged E2 before catalyzing transfer of Ub to substrates.Other E3s contain a Really Interesting New Gene (RING) or RING-like domain (U-box) that recruits a charged E2, as well as a domain that recruits substrates.Ub is then transferred from the E2 to the substrate, with the E3 serving primarily as a scaffold.Some RING E3s are single polypeptides, while the cullin-RING Ligases (CRLs) are modular multisubunit complexes [3].Mammalian CRLs are nucleated by one of seven cullin family members, with a RING domain protein that binds to its Cterminus.The N-terminal region of the cullin binds specific cullin adaptor proteins that engage substrate receptor proteins; the most studied class of substrate receptors are the F-Box proteins.CRLs are subject to an additional level of control by a ubiquitin-like modifier protein, Nedd8.E3 enzymes have two important roles.First, they recognize substrates and position them for ubiquitination.Second, E3s dictate the nature of the Ub linkage(s), which will determine the substrate's fate.For HECT E3s, the Ub chain type is dictated by the C-terminal lobe of the HECT domain [4].By contrast, RINGtype E3s direct Ub chain type based upon the charged E2 that they recruit [5].Successful pathogens use proteins that interfere with host cell function that are delivered into eukaryotic host cells via specialized secretion systems and collectively referred to as ''effectors.''Remarkably, although ubiquitin is restricted to eukaryotic cells,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS PathogensSame topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysFrench-language works237,207