Effect of Long-term Omeprazole Treatment on Antral G and D Cells in Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Long-term omeprazole therapy is associated with hypergastrinemia. In the antrum, gastrin secretion from G cells is inhibited in a paracrine manner by somatostatin secreted from D cells. Omeprazole may alter the ratio of G to D cells; however, there are limited data concerning such an effect in humans and none in children. The authors studied the effect of long-term omeprazole therapy on antral G- and D-cell numbers in children. METHODS: Six children received omeprazole for 4 to 7 years for erosive reflux esophagitis. Endoscopic antral biopsy specimens obtained at baseline and at 1, 4, and 7 years of omeprazole administration were immunostained to assess G and D cell numbers per antral gland. The G- and D-cell numbers were also assessed in an age-matched control group consisting of 24 healthy children from six different age groups. RESULTS: The mean G-cell number per unit area showed a significant increase at 4 years (85 +/- 5.7 years) and at 7 years (89 +/- 6.8 years) on omeprazole compared with baseline (56 +/- 4.8 years) ( P < 0.01). D-cell numbers did not change. The ratio of G to D cells increased progressively, and the change from baseline was significant at 7 years taking omeprazole ( P < 0.02). In the control group, G- and D-cell numbers did not differ significantly within the six age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term omeprazole therapy is associated with a significant increase in G-cell numbers and in the ratio of G to D cells in children. These changes reflect the effect of omeprazole because there was no change in these parameters in the age-matched control group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".