Drilling Optimization Using Bit Selection Expert System and ROP Prediction Algorithm Improves Drilling Performance and Enhances Operational Decision Making by Reducing Performance Uncertainties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A rule based drill bit selection expert software system and Rate of Penetration (ROP) prediction algorithm has been recently applied in the optimization process of a 4500 m vertical foothills well in Western Canada. Post well analysis shows that when the expert system recommendations were followed by the operator, increases in ROP and run length over the local pacesetter well were experienced in each hole section. ROP increases of 15% in the 311.1mm section, 52% in the 215.9mm section and 60% in the 142.9mm section were achieved, as well as bit life increases up to 33% with TCI bits. Although the operator did not follow all of the expert system recommendations through the entire well, these increases did contribute to savings in drilling time below AFE of 15 days over the entire well. Comparison with the actual drilling performance showed close agreement in trend to the predicted ROP through most lithological intervals, which helped to confirm the accuracy of the process of geological / pore pressure predictions and the ROP prediction algorithm. The expert system is a rule based bit selection system that uses a detailed description of the drilling environment, including meter based lithology, synthetic wireline logs, predicted pore pressures and anticipated operating parameters of the well or hole interval being analyzed to produce a bit selection recommendation including IADC bit type and bit features. The ROP algorithm has been developed as a drilling optimization tool and attempts to model the technical limit ROP that can be expected through a given hole interval. The ROP algorithm uses as its inputs detailed lithological descriptions of the anticipated formations, hole size, mud weight, predicted pore pressure, bit type, and anticipated operating parameters to calculate an accurate meter based ROP prediction. The ROP algorithm has been applied in several drilling environments worldwide and comparisons with actual drilling performance have been used to modify the calculations and improve predictions. The ROP algorithm improves drilling decisions, and provides performance analysis while guiding financial planning. The ROP algorithm can be applied in the planning phase of a project to develop time curves based on expected performance and to compare and contrast potential bit/BHA types based on performance predictions. Furthermore, the ROP algorithm can be used in post-well analysis to identify areas where potential drilling performance was not achieved, and help in identifying improvements for future projects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".