MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971522276 · doi:10.1139/l05-085

Response of a bridge to a moving vehicle load

2006· article· en· W1971522276 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jeng Hsiang Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeflection (physics)Structural engineeringMoving loadStandard deviationBridge (graph theory)VibrationEngineeringSurface finishSpan (engineering)Root mean squareBeam bridgeMathematicsFinite element methodStatisticsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The determination of the statistical characteristics of bridge deflections due to a load of a vehicle moving across the span of a bridge is frequently a problem of great interest for bridge engineers. Developed herein is a spectral approach for evaluating the variation of bridge deflections due to a vehicle moving at constant speed along a rough bridge surface. Based on the above-mentioned approach, this study presents a closed-form solution for variances of bridge deflections. An example of application of the solution to the estimation of variances of bridge deflections is also presented. The effects of pavement type, vehicle speed, and bridge span on standard deviation of bridge deflections are investigated. The results of numerical examples show that if the effect of engine motions on vehicle vibrations is disregarded, the standard deviation of bridge deflections is proportional to the square root of the pavement roughness coefficient a for a specified vehicle speed.Key words: moving load, bridge deflection, pavement roughness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationFrench-language works237,207