MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971534238 · doi:10.1109/iros.2010.5650457

Stereo vision based swing angle sensor for mining rope shovel

2010· article· en· W1971534238 on OpenAlexaff
Li-Heng Lin, P.D. Lawrence

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShovelSwingComputer visionArtificial intelligenceLandmarkComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Stereo cameraStereopsisPosition (finance)RopeEngineeringAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An easily retrofittable stereo vision based system for quick and temporary measurement of a mining shovel's swing angle is presented. The stereo camera is mounted externally to the upper swingable shovel house, with a clear view of the shovel's lower carbody. As the shovel swings from its 0° swing angle position, the camera revolves with the shovel house, seeing differing views of the carbody. In real-time, the camera position is tracked, which in turn is used to calculate the swing angle. The problem was solved using the Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) approach in which the system learns a map of 3D features on the carbody while using the map to determine the camera pose. The contribution includes a locally maximal Harris corner selection technique and a novel use of 3D feature clusters as landmarks, for improving the robustness of visual landmark matching in an outdoor environment. Results show that the vision-based sensor has a maximum error of +/- 1° upon map convergence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207