Optimization of the hydrochloric acid concentration used for trifluoroacetate removal from synthetic peptides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trifluoroacetate (CF3COO-, or TFA) is almost always present in commercially synthesized peptides. Unfortunately, it has a strong infrared (IR) absorption band at 1673 cm-1, significantly overlapping or even completely obscuring the amide I band of a peptide. In such cases TFA must be removed from the solution in order to be able to use IR absorption spectroscopy for peptide secondary structure determination. The most convenient and widely used procedure involves peptide lyophilization from a 0.1 M HCl solution. In our studies of the tryptophan-rich antimicrobial peptide indolicidin, we have found that caution should be taken when using this HCl concentration. High HCl concentrations (>10 mM in unbuffered solutions and > 50 mM in buffered solutions) may modify the peptide structure and reduce its thermal stability, thereby interfering with subsequent structural investigations of the peptide. Our results indicate that HCl concentrations between 2 and 10 mM are adequate to remove essentially all TFA impurities without any modification of the peptide secondary structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".