MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971606922 · doi:10.1145/1940475.1940505

Invariants and symbolic calculations in the theory of quadratic differential systems

2011· article· en· W1971606922 on OpenAlex
Dana Schlomiuk, Nicolae Vulpe

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM communications in computer algebra · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSymbolic computationQuadratic equationQuadratic differentialAlgebra over a fieldClass (philosophy)Differential (mechanical device)ComputationMathematicsPolynomialSpace (punctuation)Computer scienceTheoretical computer scienceApplied mathematicsPure mathematicsAlgorithmMathematical analysisArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While quadratic differential systems intervene in many areas of applied mathematics and they also have theoretical importance, the topological classification of this class remains an extremely hard problem. However, in recent years much progress has been achieved due to the use of computer algebra and numerical calculations for obtaining complete classifications of some families of quadratic systems by effectively computing polynomial invariants and by an interplay between computer algebra and numerical computations. We illustrate on a specific family how these techniques yield the complete classification of the family within the 12-dimensional space of the coefficients of the systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.386
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it