Long-Term Evolution and Functional Diversification in the Members of the Nucleophosmin/Nucleoplasmin Family of Nuclear Chaperones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The proper assembly of basic proteins with nucleic acids is a reaction that must be facilitated to prevent protein aggregation and formation of nonspecific nucleoprotein complexes. The proteins that mediate this orderly protein assembly are generally termed molecular (or nuclear) chaperones. The nucleophosmin/nucleoplasmin (NPM) family of molecular chaperones encompasses members ubiquitously expressed in many somatic tissues (NPM1 and -3) or specific to oocytes and eggs (NPM2). The study of this family of molecular chaperones has experienced a renewed interest in the past few years. However, there is a lack of information regarding the molecular evolution of these proteins. This work represents the first attempt to characterize the long-term evolution followed by the members of this family. Our analysis shows that there is extensive silent divergence at the nucleotide level suggesting that this family has been subject to strong purifying selection at the protein level. In contrast to NPM1 and NPM-like proteins in invertebrates, NPM2 and NPM3 have a polyphyletic origin. Furthermore, the presence of selection for high frequencies of acidic residues as well as the existence of higher levels of codon bias was detected at the C-terminal ends, which can be ascribed to the critical role played by these residues in constituting the acidic tracts and to the preferred codon usage for phosphorylatable amino acids at these regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".