MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971729337 · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/36/9/306

Exponential variational expansion in relative coordinates and scalar coupling coefficients for three-body systems

2003· article· en· W1971729337 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexei M. Frolov, Vedene H. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsExponential functionScalar (mathematics)Wave functionComputationIonPhysicsCoulombGeneralized coordinatesCoupling (piping)Atomic physicsMathematical analysisChemistryQuantum mechanicsMathematicsMaterials scienceGeometryAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exponential variational expansion is applied to highly accurate computations of the ground states in the Ps − and ∞ H − ions. The determined variational energies for these systems are −0.262 005 070 232 980 107 7335 and −0.527 751 016 544 377 196 5668 au respectively. These energies and corresponding wavefunctions are significantly more accurate than values known from earlier studies. A number of bound state properties are determined for the Ps − ion. The method of scalar coupling for three-body systems is developed. A general analytical expression is derived for the overlap integral between two scalar functions ϕ( r 32 , r 31 , r 21 ) and ψ( r 32 , r 31 ), written in relative coordinates and one-particle coordinates respectively. The case of bound S( L = 0) states in Coulomb three-body systems is discussed in detail. In this case, explicit analytical formulae for the three-body scalar coupling coefficients have been produced and tested in actual highly accurate calculations for the Ps − and ∞ H − ions. The approach developed in this work can be applied to a large number of real three-body problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical PhysicsSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207