MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971736333 · doi:10.1143/jjap.44.l196

Radiation from Tightly Focused Highly Intense Laser Pulse Interaction with Weakly Magnetized Plasma

2005· article· en· W1971736333 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Homaira Parchamy, Noboru Yugami, Takuya Muraki, Hajime Noda, Yasushi Nishida

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLaserPlasmaAtomic physicsFull width at half maximumElectronMicrowaveWavelengthRadiationPulse (music)OpticsRange (aeronautics)PhysicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From a tightly focused highly intense ultrashort laser pulse interaction with a weakly magnetized plasma, radiations in the microwave frequency range have been observed. To investigate the microwave radiation produced by the laser-plasma interaction, a mode-locked Ti:Sapphire laser beam with a wavelength of 800 nm, a pulse width of 100 fs [full width at half maximum (FWHM)], a maximum energy of 100 mJ per pulse, and a repetition rate of 10 Hz has been employed. Radiation emission characteristics could be explained by the electron motion along the applied magnetic field, where electrons are affected by the electric field created by an ion column. Calculated data of the electron motion are in good agreement with experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJapanese Journal of Applied PhysicsSame topicLaser-Plasma Interactions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207