In situ ATR-SEIRAS study of adsorption and phase formation of trimesic acid on Au(111-25 nm) film electrodes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The adsorption and phase formation of 3 mmol L1 trimesic acid (TMA) on Au(111-25 nm) film electrodes in contact with aq. 0.1 mol L1 HClO4 electrolyte have been investigated by in situ ATR-SEIRAS, cyclic voltammetry, chronoamperometry, and STM measurements. Depending on the applied electrode potential, TMA molecules assemble in three distinctly different 2D ordered adlayers. In the range 0.10 < E < 0.50 V, planar-oriented molecules form an open ring honeycomb pattern (phase I) stabilized by directional hydrogen bonds. Interfacial water molecules are being replaced. A close-packed, physisorbed adlayer II forms at higher potentials in the range 0.58 < E < 0.75 V. Further increase of the electrode potential causes an orientation change. An initially disordered phase transforms into an ordered, stripe-like chemisorbed adlayer III of perpendicularly oriented TMA molecules (0.90 < E < 1.20 V). One carboxylate group per molecule is bound to the electrode surface, while the two other protonated carboxyl groups are directed toward the electrolyte, and act as structure-determining components of a hydrogen-bonded molecular ladder network. Strongly hydrogen-bonded and isolated water species are co-adsorbed. The potential-induced formation of chemisorbed TMA proceeds in two steps: (i) orientation change from planar to a disordered tilted and (or) perpendicular phase IIIa (τ < 5 ms) according to a Langmuir-type kinetics; (ii) subsequently, the chemisorbed TMA molecules align into a highly ordered, stripe-like phase IIIb with co-adsorbed water species. Key words: ATR-SEIRAS, trimesic acid, Au(111), supramolecular assembly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".