MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971809461 · doi:10.1109/isic.2014.6967643

Multi-robot charged system search-based optimal path planning in static environments

2014· article· en· W1971809461 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMotion planningMobile robotMathematical optimizationRobotPath (computing)Computer scienceSet (abstract data type)Any-angle path planningPopulationSpare partHolonomicArtificial intelligenceMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an optimal path planning approach based on Charged System Search (CSS) algorithms. The approach is applied to multiple mobile robots on holonomic wheeled platforms. Optimization problems (o.p.s) are defined for each robot to minimize the weighted sum of four objective functions whose minimization targets four path planning objectives. The CSS algorithms are mapped onto the o.p.s considering that the fitness functions are the objective functions, the search spare is the solution space, the agents (charged particles) are the mobile robots, and the population of agents is the set of mobile robots. Therefore, the optimal solutions to the o.p.s are the optimal paths. The new path planning approach is validated by experiments, and a comparison with other nature-inspired optimization-based path planning approaches is given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score0.796

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207