Effect of the Absence or Presence of Various Protein Supplements on Further Development of Bovine Oocytes During In Vitro Maturation1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The evaluation of culture medium for bovine oocytes has progressed toward more defined conditions during the last few years. The main objective of this study was to evaluate different sources of albumin as a protein supplement during in vitro maturation (IVM) of bovine oocytes in synthetic oviduct fluid medium (SOF). The replacement of protein with polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) or polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) was also evaluated. The effect of recombinant human FSH on cumulus expansion and nuclear maturation in SOF containing BSA (BSA-V) or PVP-40 was also studied. Addition of BSA-V during IVM retarded nuclear maturation when compared with addition of PVP-40 or use of SOF alone. The inclusion of different concentrations of BSA-V, fetal calf serum (FCS), or PVA during IVM had no positive effect on the developmental capacity of the oocytes compared with the use of SOF alone with no supplement but significantly decreased the percentage of embryos reaching the morula and blastocyst stages. However, when BSA-V was replaced with purified BSA, BSA that was essentially free of fatty acids, or chicken egg albumin, embryonic development rates were restored. The presence of PVP-40 but not PVP-360 during IVM significantly increased morula and blastocyst production. These results indicate that although SOF alone can support bovine oocyte maturation, a high proportion of morulae and blastocysts can be produced from IVM oocytes cultured in medium containing PVP-40. These studies are the first to show that the effect of FSH on nuclear maturation and cumulus expansion is dependent on substrates present in IVM medium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".