MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971841080 · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.110.079665

From predisposition to illness: genetically sensitive intermediate pathways to mood disorders

2010· editorial· en· W1971841080 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Duffy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe British Journal of Psychiatry · 2010
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCognitive Abilities and Testing
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenetic predispositionMood disordersMoodPsychologyGeneticsMedicinePsychiatryBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The contemporary model of mood disorders proposes that multiple susceptibility genes interact with multiple other risk factors. However, the specific nature of the genetic vulnerability and the intermediate causal pathways are not known. In this edition of the Journal, Goodyer and colleagues report new findings suggesting genetic moderation of an association between elevated cortisol and depression in high-risk adolescents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0140.022
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe British Journal of PsychiatrySame topicCognitive Abilities and TestingFrench-language works237,207