Experimental and Theoretical Studies on Stereo- and Regioselectivity in Intramolecular Nitrone−Alkene Cycloaddition of Hept-6-enoses Derived from Carbohydrates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of blocking groups and stereochemistry of the substituents on the regio- and stereoselectivity in intramolecular nitrone-alkene cycloaddition (INAC) of hept-6-enoses are reported. L-ribo-Hept-6-enose 12 and D-lyxo-hept-6-enose 15, both containing a 2,3-O-isopropylidene blocking group, and L-xylo-hept-6-enose 23 and D-arabino-hept-6-enose 30, both with a 2,3-O-trans-diacetal blocking group, were prepared from D-ribose and D-arabinose, respectively. With N-alkyl hydroxylamine, lactols 12 and 15 underwent an INAC reaction to give cis-fused isoxazolidines exclusively whereas lactols 23 and 30 gave a mixture of cis-, trans-fused isoxazolidines (cyclohexanols) and bridged isoxazolidines (cycloheptanols). With the 2,3-O-trans-diacetal protecting group, the bridged bicyclo[4.2.1]isoxazolidines (cycloheptanols), via the endo mode of INAC cyclization, were synthesized for the first time from unbranched sugar derivatives 23 and 30. The stereochemical outcomes of these reactions were rationalized on the basis of transition state energies obtained by computation. The present INAC showed trivial temperature, but significant solvent dependence. For lactols 23 and 30, performing the INAC in 2-propanol gave the best yields of fused isoxazolidines (cyclohexanols) whereas in dichloromethane afforded the best yields of bridged isoxazolidines (cycloheptanols).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".