MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971849209 · doi:10.1242/jcs.00943

A non-chromosomal factor allows viability of<i>Schizosaccharomyces pombe</i>lacking the essential chaperone calnexin

2004· article· en· W1971849209 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe Collin, Pascale B. Beauregard, Aram Elagöz, Luis A. Rokeach

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cell Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalnexinBiologySchizosaccharomyces pombeChaperone (clinical)Cell biologySchizosaccharomycesEndoplasmic reticulumMutantGeneticsCalreticulinGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calnexin is a molecular chaperone playing key roles in protein folding and the quality control of this process in the endoplasmic reticulum. We, and others, have previously demonstrated that cnx1(+), the gene encoding the calnexin homologue in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, is essential for viability. We show that a particular cnx1 mutant induces a novel mechanism allowing the survival of S. pombe cells in the absence of calnexin/Cnx1p. Calnexin independence is dominant in diploid cells and is inherited in a non-Mendelian manner. Remarkably, this survival pathway, bypassing the necessity for calnexin, can be transmitted by transformation of cell extracts into a wild-type naive strain, thus implicating a non-chromosomal factor. Nuclease and UV treatments of cells extracts did not obliterate transmission of calnexin independence by transformation. However, protease digestion of extracts did reduce the appearance of calnexin-independent cells, indicating that a protein element is required for calnexin-less viability. We discuss a model in which this calnexin-less survival mechanism would be activated and perpetuated by a protein component acting as a genetic element.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cell ScienceSame topicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207