MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971857836 · doi:10.1149/06403.0567ecst

A Comprehensive Single-Phase, Non-Isothermal Mathematical MEA Model and Analysis of Non-Isothermal Effects

2014· article· en· W1971857836 on OpenAlexafffund
Madhur Bhaiya, Andreas Pütz, Marc Secanell

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsAutomotive Fuel Cell Cooperation (Canada)University of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsIsothermal processThermodynamicsJoule heatingMaterials scienceAnodeElectrolyteDesorptionDiffusionSorptionHeat transferAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryAdsorptionElectrodeComposite materialChromatographyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A comprehensive single-phase non-isothermal MEA model, accounting for all applicable heat sources, viz., entropic and irreversible heating associated with electrochemical reactions, ohmic heating, phase change, and heat release/absorption due to sorption/desorption of water in electrolyte is presented. The model accounts for water management in two phases, vapour and sorbed phase, and temperature driven vapour diffusion, and thermal osmosis. It is integrated into openFCST, an open-source fuel cell simulation framework. Maximum temperatures inside the cell rise by up to 12°C. A detailed breakdown of various heat sources inside the cell is studied. The heat of sorption, ignored in the literature, is more significant than protonic ohmic heating at medium currents and causes a shift in temperature distribution in the in-plane direction. Reversible heat distribution based on Ref. [1] resulted in temperature shifts with anode catalyst layer being the hottest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207