MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971861352 · doi:10.1021/bi7008079

Effects of Metal Ion Binding on Structural Dynamics of Human Hemopexin

2007· article· en· W1971861352 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHemoglobin structure and function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemopexinChemistryHemeMetalMetal ions in aqueous solutionIonAbsorption (acoustics)MetalloproteinMyoglobinBiophysicsBiochemistryMaterials scienceEnzymeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hemopexin (Hx) functions as a major heme scavenging protein in blood plasma and as such circulates without heme bound. In recent work, we have demonstrated that Hx binds metal ions in vitro in a manner that varies from one metal ion to another and that changes with heme binding. The structural consequences of metal ion binding to the form of Hx that dominates in plasma have now been evaluated by monitoring metal ion-linked changes in tertiary structure of the protein as reflected by changes in the near-UV CD spectrum and the ultraviolet absorption spectrum as a function of temperature. As part of this analysis we have developed thermally induced difference absorption maps (TIDAMs) to afford efficient visualization of temperature-dependent changes in the UV spectrum of Hx that are induced by binding of metal ions. The results are interpreted in terms of recent models proposed for metal ion binding sites on Hx and have implications for the possible modulation of heme binding to Hx by metal ions in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.573

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it