Temperature Dependence of the Air Concentrations of Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers in a Forest and a Clearing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) were quantified in 67 high volume air samples taken concurrently in a forest and a clearing in southern Ontario, Canada from October 2001 to November 2002. Air concentrations were comparable between the two sites. Gaseous PCBs ranged from 6.4 to 150 pg x m(-3), and gaseous PBDEs ranged from below method detection limit (BDL) to 55 pg x m(-3) (with two extreme events up to 290 pg x m(-3)). Particulate PBDEs ranged from BDL to 40 pg x m(-3). Gaseous concentrations of PCBs and PBDEs were highly temperature dependent, suggesting a relatively strong influence of re-evaporation. Air concentrations of highly chlorinated PCBs in the forest were more temperature dependent than those in the clearing, whereas no difference was observed for the less-chlorinated PCBs. Forest filtering may have enriched highly chlorinated PCBs in the forest soil relative to the soil in the clearing, resulting in a higher contribution of re-evaporation for highly chlorinated PCBs at the forest. Compared to measurements conducted a decade earlier at a nearby site, PCB air concentrations were generally less temperature dependent, indicative of a reduction in the contribution of re-evaporation in the region. Furthermore, a significant correlation was found between temperature dependence and degree of chlorination, which had not been apparent in the previous study. This is presumably because depuration from soils occurred slower for highly chlorinated PCBs, resulting in their relatively higher abundance in terrestrial surfaces and, therefore, higher contribution from re-evaporation. Contrasting with the PCBs, the temperature dependence of PBDE air concentrations did not differ between congeners or between forest and clearing site. This could be a result of different usage and emission history: PCBs were banned approximately three decades ago, whereas PBDEs are currently still in use. Consequently, the influence of primary emissions on air concentrations is expected to be more important for PBDEs than for PCBs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".