Electrochemical and PM-IRRAS Studies of the Effect of the Static Electric Field on the Structure of the DMPC Bilayer Supported at a Au(111) Electrode Surface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Differential capacity, charge density measurements, and polarization modulation infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy (PM-IRRAS) were employed to study the fusion of small unilamellar vesicles of 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC) on a Au(111) electrode surface. The differential capacity and charge density data showed that the vesicles fuse onto the gold surface at charge densities between -10 microC/cm(2) < sigma(M) < 10 microC/cm(2) to form a bilayer. When sigma(M) < -10 microC/cm(2), the film is detached from the surface but it remains in close proximity to the surface. PM-IRRAS experiments provided IR spectra for the bilayer in the adsorbed and the desorbed state. Ab initio normal coordinate calculations were performed to assist interpretation of the IR spectra. The IR bands were analyzed quantitatively, and this analysis provided information concerning the conformation and orientation of the acyl chains and the polar head region of the DMPC molecule. The orientation of the chains, hydration, and conformation of the headgroup of the DMPC molecule strongly depend on the electrode potential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".