MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971879135 · doi:10.1080/14681360500200213

The construction of ‘minority teacher’ subjects: a foucauldian exploration

2005· article· en· W1971879135 on OpenAlex
Gada Mahrouse

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePedagogy Culture and Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Education and Multiculturalism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoInstitute for Christian Studies
FundersMinistère de l’Éducation, Gouvernement de l’Ontario
KeywordsSubject (documents)NarrativePower (physics)SociologyGender studiesPosition (finance)PedagogyPsychologyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article offers a critical examination of the relations of power that exist in educational contexts in which the teacher is a member of an ethno-racial ‘minority’. By interrogating the concept of the ‘minority teacher’, this study explores some of the ways human beings become subjects and how individuals come to occupy racialized subject positions. Foucault's conceptions of discourse, power, and subject formation are drawn from to examine the discursive ways ‘minority teachers' are positioned and how they actively take up this subject position. Through an exploration of academic literature and narratives on being a ‘minority teacher’, the article shows how individuals are produced and reproduce themselves as ‘minority teacher’ subjects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.645

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it