MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971926166 · doi:10.1145/2752489.2752490

Reliability Analysis and Quality Impact Prediction in Application Architecture evolution

2015· article· en· W1971926166 on OpenAlexafffund
Sepideh Emam, John Komick

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware System Performance and Reliability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsComputer scienceReliability (semiconductor)Hidden Markov modelMarkov chainArchitectureQuality (philosophy)Scale (ratio)Markov modelMarkov processMachine learningReliability engineeringData miningArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although many architecture evolution techniques exist, most of them are not able to perform a quality impact prediction. Most of these techniques concentrate on analyzing the expected performance and reliability of design alternatives on prototypes or previous experiences. In this paper, we propose a novel model-driven prediction approach, which is estimated, based on the extractable information from the User Behavioral Flow and the Continues-Time Markov Chain (CTMC) and its corresponding Hidden Markov Mode (HMM). This paper also reports our experience and the lessons we learned in applying this approach on MyUAlberta applications as a large-scale case study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.521
Threshold uncertainty score0.862

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware System Performance and ReliabilityFrench-language works237,207